Zadbaj o dobrą organizację dzięki kolekcji
Zapisuj i kategoryzuj treści zgodnie ze swoimi preferencjami.
W tym dokumencie opisujemy kilka rzeczywistych scenariuszy, w których interfejs Address Validation API zwraca sygnały odpowiedzi uzasadniające zachowanie akceptacji przez Twój system. Więcej informacji znajdziesz w sekcji Przykładowe przepływy pracy w artykule Tworzenie logiki weryfikacji.
Typowy przykład: akceptowanie
Ten scenariusz ilustruje adres, w przypadku którego system zaakceptuje adres wpisany przez klienta.
Wpisano adres
Region
76 Buckingham Palace Road, Londyn SW1W 9TQ, Wielka Brytania
W połączeniu te sygnały wskazują na adres o wysokiej jakości.
Przykłady przypadków granicznych: akceptacja
Poniższe przykłady pokazują sytuacje, w których symbol verdict wskazuje problemy z jakością adresu, które wymagają dalszego zbadania. Przykłady te pokazują też, jak logika może przechodzić od wyniku do komponentów adresu, aby uzyskać pełniejszy obraz i ulepszyć logikę systemu.
Niepotwierdzony numer domu spoza Stanów Zjednoczonych
Ten przykład ilustruje wprowadzanie włoskiego adresu ze wszystkimi komponentami adresu, bez komponentów wywnioskowanych lub zastąpionych. Jednak validationGranularity to ROUTE.
Wpisano adres
Region
Via Fonte Grugnale, 14 unit 2, 66054 Vasto CH, Włochy
Niepotwierdzony numer domu w Stanach Zjednoczonych
Ten przykład ilustruje wprowadzanie adresu w Stanach Zjednoczonych ze wszystkimi komponentami adresu, bez komponentów wywnioskowanych lub zastąpionych. Jednak validationGranularity to PREMISE_PROXIMITY.
Ten przykład ilustruje wpisanie adresu w Stanach Zjednoczonych ze wszystkimi potwierdzonymi komponentami adresu, bez komponentów wywnioskowanych ani zastąpionych, oraz z validationGranularity o wartości PREMISE. Pole uspsData nie jest jednak w pełni wypełnione i nie zawiera wartości dpvConfirmation.
Wpisano adres
Region
155 Via Condado Way, Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33418-1703
US
Wynik dla potwierdzonego adresu z niekompletnymi danymi USPS
[[["Łatwo zrozumieć","easyToUnderstand","thumb-up"],["Rozwiązało to mój problem","solvedMyProblem","thumb-up"],["Inne","otherUp","thumb-up"]],[["Brak potrzebnych mi informacji","missingTheInformationINeed","thumb-down"],["Zbyt skomplikowane / zbyt wiele czynności do wykonania","tooComplicatedTooManySteps","thumb-down"],["Nieaktualne treści","outOfDate","thumb-down"],["Problem z tłumaczeniem","translationIssue","thumb-down"],["Problem z przykładami/kodem","samplesCodeIssue","thumb-down"],["Inne","otherDown","thumb-down"]],["Ostatnia aktualizacja: 2025-08-31 UTC."],[[["\u003cp\u003eThe Address Validation API provides signals to determine if an address should be accepted by your system, even with minor uncertainties.\u003c/p\u003e\n"],["\u003cp\u003eAddresses with \u003ccode\u003evalidationGranularity\u003c/code\u003e of \u003ccode\u003ePREMISE\u003c/code\u003e and no unconfirmed/inferred/replaced components are generally safe to accept.\u003c/p\u003e\n"],["\u003cp\u003eAddresses with \u003ccode\u003eUNCONFIRMED_BUT_PLAUSIBLE\u003c/code\u003e street numbers can be accepted, but consider prompting the customer for confirmation for higher confidence.\u003c/p\u003e\n"],["\u003cp\u003eUS addresses with \u003ccode\u003edpvConfirmation\u003c/code\u003e of 'N' might require customer confirmation or correction, depending on your system's confidence requirements.\u003c/p\u003e\n"],["\u003cp\u003eEven with incomplete USPS data, addresses with \u003ccode\u003evalidationGranularity\u003c/code\u003e of \u003ccode\u003ePREMISE\u003c/code\u003e can often be accepted, but consider prompting the customer for confirmation.\u003c/p\u003e\n"]]],[],null,["This document describes a number of real-world scenarios where the\nAddress Validation API provides response signals that warrant an *accept* behavior\nfrom your system. See\n[Example workflows](/maps/documentation/address-validation/build-validation-logic#example-workflows) in\n**Build your validation logic** for context.\n| **Note:** The examples here are illustrative, but don't cover all scenarios.\n\nCommon example: accept\n\nThis scenario illustrates an address in which your system would accept an\naddress entered by a customer.\n\n| Address entered | Region |\n|--------------------------------------------|--------|\n| 76 Buckingham Palace Road, London SW1W 9TQ | UK |\n\nVerdict for an acceptable address\n\nThe example below highlights the important signals. \n\n {\n \"inputGranularity\": \"PREMISE\",\n \"validationGranularity\": \"PREMISE\",\n \"geocodeGranularity\": \"PREMISE\",\n \"addressComplete\": true\n }\n\nIn addition to this, the response indicates the following:\n\n- `hasUnconfirmedComponents` remains `false`\n- `hasInferredComponents` remains `false`\n- `hasReplacedComponents` remains `false`\n- `hasSpellCorrectedComponents` remains `false`\n\nWhen combined together, these signals indicate a high-quality address.\n| **Action:** Accept.\n\nEdge case examples: accept\n\nThe following examples cover situations in which the `verdict` indicates address\nquality issues that warrant further investigation. These examples also\nillustrate how your logic can travel from the verdict to the address components\nto obtain a more complete picture in order to enhance your system logic.\n\nNon-US unconfirmed street number\n\nThis example illustrates entry of an Italian address with all address components\npresent, along with no inferred or replaced components. However, the\n`validationGranularity` is `ROUTE`.\n\n| Address entered | Region |\n|-------------------------------------------------------|--------|\n| Via Fonte Grugnale, 14 unit 2, 66054 Vasto CH, Italia | IT |\n\nVerdict for an unconfirmed street number \n\n {\n \"inputGranularity\": \"SUB_PREMISE\",\n \"validationGranularity\": \"ROUTE\",\n \"geocodeGranularity\": \"ROUTE\",\n \"addressComplete\": true,\n \"hasUnconfirmedComponents\": true\n }\n\nFurther investigation of the address components reveals that the street\nnumber is `UNCONFIRMED_BUT_PLAUSIBLE`. \n\n {\n \"text\": \"14\",\n \"componentType\": \"street_number\",\n \"confirmationLevel\": \"UNCONFIRMED_BUT_PLAUSIBLE\"\n }\n\n| **Action:** This address can be accepted without further prompting. However, for a higher confidence level, you can prompt the customer to confirm the address. See [Implementation guidance](/maps/documentation/address-validation/build-validation-logic#implementation_guidance) in **Build your validation logic** for more details.\n\nUS unconfirmed street number\n\nThis example illustrates entry of a US address with all address components\npresent, with no inferred or replaced components. However, the\n`validationGranularity` is `PREMISE_PROXIMITY`.\n\n| Address entered | Region |\n|------------------------------------|--------|\n| 975 Carson Dr, Sunnyvale, CA 94086 | US |\n\nUSPS data for an unconfirmed street number \n\n {\n \"firstAddressLine\": \"975 CARSON DR\",\n \"cityStateZipAddressLine\": \"SUNNYVALE CA 94086\",\n \"city\": \"SUNNYVALE\",\n \"state\": \"CA\",\n \"zipCode\": \"94086\"\n \"dpvConfirmation\": \"N\",\n \"dpvFootnote\": \"AAM3\",\n \"carrierRoute\": \"C031\",\n \"carrierRouteIndicator\": \"D\",\n \"postOfficeCity\": \"SUNNYVALE\",\n \"postOfficeState\": \"CA\",\n \"fipsCountyCode\": \"085\",\n \"county\": \"SANTA CLARA\",\n }\n\n| **Action:** Fix. This example is similar to the previous one, and the address can be accepted as entered. However, the additional `dpvConfirmation` code of `N` provides a strong signal to confirm the address with the customer or prompt them to fix it. The behavior you choose for this case ultimately depends on your required confidence level. See [Implementation guidance](/maps/documentation/address-validation/build-validation-logic#implementation_guidance) in **Build your validation logic** for more details.\n\nIncomplete USPS data for a confirmed address\n\nThis example illustrates entry of a US address with all address components\nconfirmed, with no inferred or replaced components, and a\n`validationGranularity` of `PREMISE`. However, the `uspsData` is not fully\npopulated, and does not contain a `dpvConfirmation` value.\n\n| Address entered | Region |\n|--------------------------------------------------------|--------|\n| 155 Via Condado Way, Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33418-1703 | US |\n\nVerdict for a confirmed address with incomplete USPS data \n\n {\n \"inputGranularity\": \"PREMISE\",\n \"validationGranularity\": \"PREMISE\",\n \"geocodeGranularity\": \"PREMISE\",\n \"addressComplete\": true,\n }\n\nUSPS data for a confirmed address with incomplete USPS data \n\n {\n \"standardizedAddress\": {\n \"firstAddressLine\": \"155 VIA CONDADO WAY\",\n \"cityStateZipAddressLine\": \"PALM BEACH GARDENS\",\n \"city\": \"PALM BEACH GARDENS\",\n \"state\": \"FL\",\n \"zipCode\": \"33418\"\n },\n \"carrierRoute\": \"H018\",\n \"postOfficeCity\": \"PALM BEACH GARDENS\",\n \"postOfficeState\": \"FL\"\n }\n\n| **Action:** Accept. Even though the address is not DPV confirmed by the USPS, the `validationGranularity` of `PREMISE` gives a strong signal that this is a valid address. However, for a higher confidence level, you can prompt the customer to confirm the address. See [Implementation guidance](/maps/documentation/address-validation/build-validation-logic#implementation_guidance) in **Build your validation logic** for more details.\n| **Note:** The service receives updated USPS data periodically, so this example may no longer return incomplete USPS data. This example is meant to be illustrative rather than an accurate portrayal of the API response for this address."]]
