Mantieni tutto organizzato con le raccolte
Salva e classifica i contenuti in base alle tue preferenze.
Questo documento descrive una serie di scenari reali in cui l'API Address Validation fornisce indicatori di risposta che giustificano un comportamento di accettazione da parte del tuo sistema. Per un contesto, consulta
Flussi di lavoro di esempio in
Crea la logica di convalida.
Esempio comune: accetta
Questo scenario illustra un indirizzo in cui il tuo sistema accetterebbe un indirizzo inserito da un cliente.
Indirizzo inserito
Regione
76 Buckingham Palace Road, London SW1W 9TQ
Regno Unito
Verdetto per un indirizzo accettabile
L'esempio riportato di seguito evidenzia gli indicatori importanti.
Se combinati, questi indicatori indicano un indirizzo di alta qualità.
Esempi di casi limite: accetta
I seguenti esempi riguardano situazioni in cui verdict indica problemi di qualità dell'indirizzo che richiedono ulteriori indagini. Questi esempi illustrano anche come la logica può passare dal verdetto ai componenti dell'indirizzo per ottenere un quadro più completo al fine di migliorare la logica del sistema.
Numero civico non confermato non statunitense
Questo esempio illustra l'inserimento di un indirizzo italiano con tutti i componenti dell'indirizzo
presenti, senza componenti dedotti o sostituiti. Tuttavia, il
validationGranularity è ROUTE.
Indirizzo inserito
Regione
Via Fonte Grugnale, 14 unità 2, 66054 Vasto CH, Italia
Questo esempio illustra l'inserimento di un indirizzo statunitense con tutti i componenti dell'indirizzo
presenti, senza componenti dedotti o sostituiti. Tuttavia, il
validationGranularity è PREMISE_PROXIMITY.
Questo esempio illustra l'inserimento di un indirizzo statunitense con tutti i componenti dell'indirizzo
confermati, senza componenti dedotti o sostituiti e un
validationGranularity di PREMISE. Tuttavia, uspsData non è completamente
compilato e non contiene un valore dpvConfirmation.
Indirizzo inserito
Regione
155 Via Condado Way, Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33418-1703
US
Verdetto per un indirizzo confermato con dati USPS incompleti
[[["Facile da capire","easyToUnderstand","thumb-up"],["Il problema è stato risolto","solvedMyProblem","thumb-up"],["Altra","otherUp","thumb-up"]],[["Mancano le informazioni di cui ho bisogno","missingTheInformationINeed","thumb-down"],["Troppo complicato/troppi passaggi","tooComplicatedTooManySteps","thumb-down"],["Obsoleti","outOfDate","thumb-down"],["Problema di traduzione","translationIssue","thumb-down"],["Problema relativo a esempi/codice","samplesCodeIssue","thumb-down"],["Altra","otherDown","thumb-down"]],["Ultimo aggiornamento 2025-08-31 UTC."],[[["\u003cp\u003eThe Address Validation API provides signals to determine if an address should be accepted by your system, even with minor uncertainties.\u003c/p\u003e\n"],["\u003cp\u003eAddresses with \u003ccode\u003evalidationGranularity\u003c/code\u003e of \u003ccode\u003ePREMISE\u003c/code\u003e and no unconfirmed/inferred/replaced components are generally safe to accept.\u003c/p\u003e\n"],["\u003cp\u003eAddresses with \u003ccode\u003eUNCONFIRMED_BUT_PLAUSIBLE\u003c/code\u003e street numbers can be accepted, but consider prompting the customer for confirmation for higher confidence.\u003c/p\u003e\n"],["\u003cp\u003eUS addresses with \u003ccode\u003edpvConfirmation\u003c/code\u003e of 'N' might require customer confirmation or correction, depending on your system's confidence requirements.\u003c/p\u003e\n"],["\u003cp\u003eEven with incomplete USPS data, addresses with \u003ccode\u003evalidationGranularity\u003c/code\u003e of \u003ccode\u003ePREMISE\u003c/code\u003e can often be accepted, but consider prompting the customer for confirmation.\u003c/p\u003e\n"]]],[],null,["This document describes a number of real-world scenarios where the\nAddress Validation API provides response signals that warrant an *accept* behavior\nfrom your system. See\n[Example workflows](/maps/documentation/address-validation/build-validation-logic#example-workflows) in\n**Build your validation logic** for context.\n| **Note:** The examples here are illustrative, but don't cover all scenarios.\n\nCommon example: accept\n\nThis scenario illustrates an address in which your system would accept an\naddress entered by a customer.\n\n| Address entered | Region |\n|--------------------------------------------|--------|\n| 76 Buckingham Palace Road, London SW1W 9TQ | UK |\n\nVerdict for an acceptable address\n\nThe example below highlights the important signals. \n\n {\n \"inputGranularity\": \"PREMISE\",\n \"validationGranularity\": \"PREMISE\",\n \"geocodeGranularity\": \"PREMISE\",\n \"addressComplete\": true\n }\n\nIn addition to this, the response indicates the following:\n\n- `hasUnconfirmedComponents` remains `false`\n- `hasInferredComponents` remains `false`\n- `hasReplacedComponents` remains `false`\n- `hasSpellCorrectedComponents` remains `false`\n\nWhen combined together, these signals indicate a high-quality address.\n| **Action:** Accept.\n\nEdge case examples: accept\n\nThe following examples cover situations in which the `verdict` indicates address\nquality issues that warrant further investigation. These examples also\nillustrate how your logic can travel from the verdict to the address components\nto obtain a more complete picture in order to enhance your system logic.\n\nNon-US unconfirmed street number\n\nThis example illustrates entry of an Italian address with all address components\npresent, along with no inferred or replaced components. However, the\n`validationGranularity` is `ROUTE`.\n\n| Address entered | Region |\n|-------------------------------------------------------|--------|\n| Via Fonte Grugnale, 14 unit 2, 66054 Vasto CH, Italia | IT |\n\nVerdict for an unconfirmed street number \n\n {\n \"inputGranularity\": \"SUB_PREMISE\",\n \"validationGranularity\": \"ROUTE\",\n \"geocodeGranularity\": \"ROUTE\",\n \"addressComplete\": true,\n \"hasUnconfirmedComponents\": true\n }\n\nFurther investigation of the address components reveals that the street\nnumber is `UNCONFIRMED_BUT_PLAUSIBLE`. \n\n {\n \"text\": \"14\",\n \"componentType\": \"street_number\",\n \"confirmationLevel\": \"UNCONFIRMED_BUT_PLAUSIBLE\"\n }\n\n| **Action:** This address can be accepted without further prompting. However, for a higher confidence level, you can prompt the customer to confirm the address. See [Implementation guidance](/maps/documentation/address-validation/build-validation-logic#implementation_guidance) in **Build your validation logic** for more details.\n\nUS unconfirmed street number\n\nThis example illustrates entry of a US address with all address components\npresent, with no inferred or replaced components. However, the\n`validationGranularity` is `PREMISE_PROXIMITY`.\n\n| Address entered | Region |\n|------------------------------------|--------|\n| 975 Carson Dr, Sunnyvale, CA 94086 | US |\n\nUSPS data for an unconfirmed street number \n\n {\n \"firstAddressLine\": \"975 CARSON DR\",\n \"cityStateZipAddressLine\": \"SUNNYVALE CA 94086\",\n \"city\": \"SUNNYVALE\",\n \"state\": \"CA\",\n \"zipCode\": \"94086\"\n \"dpvConfirmation\": \"N\",\n \"dpvFootnote\": \"AAM3\",\n \"carrierRoute\": \"C031\",\n \"carrierRouteIndicator\": \"D\",\n \"postOfficeCity\": \"SUNNYVALE\",\n \"postOfficeState\": \"CA\",\n \"fipsCountyCode\": \"085\",\n \"county\": \"SANTA CLARA\",\n }\n\n| **Action:** Fix. This example is similar to the previous one, and the address can be accepted as entered. However, the additional `dpvConfirmation` code of `N` provides a strong signal to confirm the address with the customer or prompt them to fix it. The behavior you choose for this case ultimately depends on your required confidence level. See [Implementation guidance](/maps/documentation/address-validation/build-validation-logic#implementation_guidance) in **Build your validation logic** for more details.\n\nIncomplete USPS data for a confirmed address\n\nThis example illustrates entry of a US address with all address components\nconfirmed, with no inferred or replaced components, and a\n`validationGranularity` of `PREMISE`. However, the `uspsData` is not fully\npopulated, and does not contain a `dpvConfirmation` value.\n\n| Address entered | Region |\n|--------------------------------------------------------|--------|\n| 155 Via Condado Way, Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33418-1703 | US |\n\nVerdict for a confirmed address with incomplete USPS data \n\n {\n \"inputGranularity\": \"PREMISE\",\n \"validationGranularity\": \"PREMISE\",\n \"geocodeGranularity\": \"PREMISE\",\n \"addressComplete\": true,\n }\n\nUSPS data for a confirmed address with incomplete USPS data \n\n {\n \"standardizedAddress\": {\n \"firstAddressLine\": \"155 VIA CONDADO WAY\",\n \"cityStateZipAddressLine\": \"PALM BEACH GARDENS\",\n \"city\": \"PALM BEACH GARDENS\",\n \"state\": \"FL\",\n \"zipCode\": \"33418\"\n },\n \"carrierRoute\": \"H018\",\n \"postOfficeCity\": \"PALM BEACH GARDENS\",\n \"postOfficeState\": \"FL\"\n }\n\n| **Action:** Accept. Even though the address is not DPV confirmed by the USPS, the `validationGranularity` of `PREMISE` gives a strong signal that this is a valid address. However, for a higher confidence level, you can prompt the customer to confirm the address. See [Implementation guidance](/maps/documentation/address-validation/build-validation-logic#implementation_guidance) in **Build your validation logic** for more details.\n| **Note:** The service receives updated USPS data periodically, so this example may no longer return incomplete USPS data. This example is meant to be illustrative rather than an accurate portrayal of the API response for this address."]]
