Choose a user authorization model

This guide helps you to choose between using the Google Identity Services library for user authorization or implementing your own JavaScript library. It helps you decide which OAuth 2.0 authorization flow is best for your web application.

Prior to reading this guide it is assumed that you are familiar with the terms and concepts described in the Overview and How user authorization works guide.

The GIS library runs in these supported browsers on the user's device. It is not intended for use with server-side JavaScript frameworks such as Node.js, instead use Google's Node.js client library.

This guide only covers authorization and data sharing topics. It does not review user authentication, instead see Sign In With Google and the Migrating from Google Sign-In guide for user sign-up and sign-in.

Deciding if the GIS library is right for you

You must choose if using Google's library, or creating your own best fits your needs. An overview of features and functionality:

• Google's Identity Services JavaScript library implements:
  • Popup based consent flows to minimize redirects, thus enabling users to remain on your site throughout the authorization process.
  • Security features such as Cross-site Request Forgery (CRSF).
  • Helper methods to request individual scopes and confirm user consent.
  • Human friendly error handling and documentation links for use by engineers during development and later for visitors to your site.
• When implementing without the Identity Services library you are responsible for:
  • Managing requests and responses with Google's OAuth 2.0 endpoints, including redirects.
  • Optimizing the user experience.
  • Implementation of security features to validate requests, responses, and to prevent CSRF.
  • Methods to confirm a user has granted consent for any requested scopes.
  • Managing OAuth 2.0 error codes, creating human readable messages, and links to user help.

In summary, Google offers the GIS library to help you to quickly, and securely implement an OAuth 2.0 client and optimize the user's authorization experience.

Choosing an authorization flow

You will need to choose one of two OAuth 2.0 authorization flows: implicit or authorization code -- regardless if you decide to use the Google Identity Services JavaScript library or to create your own library.

Both flows result in an access token which can be used to call Google APIs.

The primary differences between the two flows are:

• the number of user actions,
• whether your app will call Google APIs without the user present,
• if a backend platform is needed to host an endpoint and to store per-user refresh tokens for individual user accounts, and
• higher or lower levels of user security.

When comparing flows and evaluating your security requirements, a factor to consider is that the level of user security varies depending on the scopes you choose. For example, viewing calendar invites as read-only might be considered less risky than using a read/write scope to edit files in Drive.

OAuth 2.0 flow comparison